COURTESY: SCROLL.IN I WRITTEN BY NANCY ADAJANIA I JAN 05, 2016 I 1st Published 1230
Originally published at scroll.in.
Robust and vulnerable by turns, artist Hema Upadhyay was
a special person and a very thoughtful artist. Her tragic end is a cautionary
tale for our art world – about the Balzacian turn that we took during the art
boom of roughly a decade ago, and which continues to be one of the troubling
legacies of that period.
As someone who was trained first in the social sciences
and then in film-making, I cannot but view our art world in terms of its
material basis. When we look at the gallas and karkhanas where so many
installations, assemblages and sculptures are made – many of us have long been
familiar with these sites – we see a classic case of an informal industrial
economy of production that is not secured by the customary guarantees that
define and regulate industrial relations. This is one of the factors that cost
us the life of one who was so dear to us.
Intriguing artist
But let these issues, serious as they undoubtedly are,
not take us away from a focus on Hema’s practice, which evolved consistently
and innovatively over the last two decades. I would like to remember Hema as an
artist who in the early 2000s, reflected on urban entropy through a feminist
reconfiguration of the genre of self-portraiture. In her paintings of that
period, you could see her as part-Zorro, part-Fearless Nadia, part-vulnerable
girl-boy, scaling the skyscrapers of a metropolis that is known to devour its
denizens if they are not careful about where they step.
It is also intriguing that her performance in her
paintings was staged through tiny Thumbelina-size self-portraits. Could this
choice of scale have articulated her need for egoless programming? Could it
have been a device that signalled her fragility, her precarious state of mind?
The central concern of Hema’s art was a metaphysical play
of scales – an enactment of the tension between maximalist visual abundance and
the minimalist elaboration of the elusive, fugitive detail.
Always thoughtful
We all have our favourite Hema story. When I wrote the
wall text for her last show – “Scales of Attention” – at the Chemould Gallery
in Mumbai, she appeared at my doorstep one day with a large magnifying glass
and an eclectic bunch of stamps. While discussing her show, I had en passant
mentioned my ongoing research on the inventive ethos of expos during the Cold
War era and the role of art in them.
Hema remembered this small detail in a long conversation
and gave me her stamp collection, which she had used in her show “Fish In A
Dead Landscape”. She said to me: “You can use these stamps in your lecture if
you like.” I have been going through Hema’s stamps during the last few days,
especially the ones showing the 1970s expo of Yemen with its stately, quirky pavilions.
I will always remember Hema through her stamps.
I was surprised, and deeply moved, that Hema had
remembered something that was important to my research but unrelated to our
collaboration – in the midst of her own various projects and preoccupations –
and that she dropped by just to give me her stamp collection.
Hema truly cared a great deal about research – her own
and that of others. A detail in newspaper reports regarding the investigation
of her murder caught my eye. I almost cried while reading the list of her
personal effects, and found mention of a library card. Hema was always eager to
learn and know more, to expand her imagination, to make the next leap of
discovery. That is how I shall always remember her.
This is the text of a speech made by Nancy Adajania at a
memorial meeting for Hema Upadhyay in Mumbai on December 22.
No comments:
Post a Comment